A very useful integral representation of the Digamma function
In this post I will derive an Integral representation for the digamma function which will turn out to be very useful in the computation of the coefficients of the Fourier series of the function that I plan to derive soon in a future post.
In these notes I try as much as possible to make each one of them as self content as possible, therefore, although it will be a little long, I will start this derivation almost from scratch, i.e., I will start proving first a product representation for the gamma function.
Ok, enough talking, lets do some math!
1. Gauss product for the Gamma function
The Gauss product for the Gamma function is given by the following formula
(1.1)
To prove this formula, recall the well known fact that
(1.2)
and the standard integral representation of the Gamma function that we are assuming here as the definition of the Gamma function
(1.3)
substituting (1.2) in (1.3) and taking the limit , we can rewrite as
Now lets consider the following integral
and integrate it by parts letting and to get
integrating by parts once again with and we get
We can already see a pattern emerging in this process. If we keep integrating by parts n-times we get
and finally
Taking the in the last expression we prove (1.1)
2. The Digamma function
The Digamma function is defined as the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function:
(2.1)
Taking log in (1.1) we get
(2.2)
differentiating (2.2) with respect to
(2.3)
Now note the following facts
(2.4)
and
(2.5)
(2.4) is straightforward. (2.5) is known as Frulani integral, to prove it consider
(2.6)
Substituting (2.6) in (2.5)
Proving (2.5). We can now rewrite (2.3) in terms of (2.4) and (2.5)
The sum inside the integral is a geometric sum, the solution is given by
I´ll provide the proof as an appendix in the end of the post, for the time being take it for granted if you are not familiar with it. We can now rewrite the last expression as
The first integral doesn’t depend on and the second vanishes as we take , and therefore we get our Goal result
Appendix
Derivation of the Geometric series
Consider
(A.1)
now multiply the above equation by
(A.2)
(A.3)
In the post we had
which we can identify as being . Plugging it in (A.3) and multiplying the result by we get the desired result
Muito bom!! Parabens
ReplyDeleteObrigado! vem coisa boa pela frente, esse é só o aquecimento!
Deleteabraço,
Saiu como maya mas é o zé, rsrs
ReplyDelete