Variation on Binet´s second formula
In this post we will prove the following result
We start by recalling Hermite´s integral representation of the Hurwitz zeta function (proved here)
(1)
We may rewrite it in a slightly different way which facilitates some calculations, to this end we start with the following lemma:
Lemma:
Proof:
We can therefore rewrite (1) as
(2)
Differentiating (2) w.r. to s we obtain
(3)
Letting and using the logarithmic representation of arctan
we obtain
rearranging terms we get:
Now let to obtain
Which concludes the proof.
Note: In the proof above we used the following previously established results
Proved here
Proved here
Proved here
Comments
Post a Comment